Back to index

Boohoo Group

Ratings &
Reviews

The addition of ratings and reviews functionality to a major e-commerce brand, giving customers access to fit, quality and sizing insight from the people who had already bought the product.

RoleLead UI Designer
ScopeWeb, 5 regions
PartnersProduct, Engineering, CRM, Legal
Outcomes6 recorded
00

The role

Promoted after two years at the company, I led a team of four designers while delivering user-focused, high-impact features. I streamlined workflows, improved stakeholder communication, and drove key projects including Ratings & Reviews, Debenhams onboarding, brand style guides, and a region-aware Size Guide built to reduce returns.

Ratings & Reviews was the largest of these. It touched the product page, the account area, transactional email and the moderation tooling behind them, which meant working across Product, Engineering, CRM, Customer Service and Legal rather than within a single squad.

01

The problem

Boohoo had no way for customers to leave product reviews. For clothing, that gap matters more than in most categories — fit and quality can’t be judged from a photograph, and a customer deciding between two similar items has nothing to go on but the imagery and a size chart.

Competitors had offered reviews for years. Customers were arriving with an expectation the site couldn’t meet, and Customer Service was fielding fit questions that other customers were already best placed to answer.

Goal 01

Give customers the fit and quality insight they need to buy with confidence.

Goal 02

Make leaving a review effortless enough that enough customers actually do it.

02

What customers actually needed

Before designing anything, we needed to know which part of a review a clothing customer actually reads. The answer shaped the entire display.

Fit and quality scales — image slot Fit and quality rating scales
Customer review with UGC — image slot A single customer review with photography
W — H — 01 / 2
03

Designing the review display

3 elements

The styling had to sit in keeping with the existing site design language so it read as an integral part of the page rather than a third-party plugin bolted on. Everything shown earned its place by being useful to a customer mid-decision.

Summary block — image slot Review summary with overall rating and recommendation percentage
Sort control — image slot Review sorting control
Mobile reviews panel — image slot Reviews panel on mobile
W — H — 01 / 3
04

Writing a review

Reading reviews is worthless if nobody writes them. The submission flow had to work from three separate starting points without becoming three separate designs.

Entry points — image slot Entry points into the review form
Review submission form — image slot The review submission form
W — H — 01 / 2
05

Where reviews appear

Reviews rolled out on web first, with the App to follow. They sit on product detail pages, with listing-page surfacing planned for a later phase so ratings can begin influencing customers earlier in the journey.

Desktop PDP — image slot Desktop product detail page with the reviews panel
W — H —
06

Rollout across regions

Launching in five regions at once meant the display had to survive translation and a moderation process had to exist before a single review went live.

Five regions at launch

GB, US, AU, IE and FR went live together, which meant the display had to accommodate translated copy without breaking the layout — French review text runs materially longer than English at the same word count.

Moderation

Every review passes through moderation before publication. I worked with Customer Service to design the queue interface and the rejection reasons, so the team could clear volume without slowing publication to a crawl.

Go-live regions — image slot Regions included in the go-live
W — H —
07

The Size Guide

Reviews answered whether something fits from other customers’ experience. The Size Guide had to answer it before anyone had bought anything, and it wasn’t. One guide covered everything, so customers had to find their way through measurements that had nothing to do with what they were buying. The confusion showed up in returns, which were costly for the business to handle.

I restructured it into product-specific guides that show only the information that matters for that product, and added region detection so sizing is set to each customer’s location. Getting it live meant working with Legal, Garment Tech, SEO, Delivery Managers and Senior Leadership, so it met every requirement and fitted the wider business goals.

Size guide on the product page — image slot The tops size guide opened from a product page, with how to measure and then the size chart
Size chart page — image slot The women's size chart page for tops and for trousers
Size guide on mobile — image slot Four mobile screens of the size guide, from how to measure to the size table
W — H — 01 / 3
08

The outcomes

6 recorded

Measured across the first 90 days after go-live, against a pre-launch baseline taken from the same set of product pages.

Outcome 0111,400 reviews collected across five regions in the first 90 days.
Outcome 0228% of active product pages carried at least one review by day 90.
Outcome 036.2% of follow-up emails resulted in a completed review.
Outcome 049.7% higher conversion on product pages carrying five or more reviews.
Outcome 054.8% reduction in returns on products where fit ratings were visible.
Outcome 0611% of reviews submitted included customer photography.

Result

Customers could finally answer the only question that mattered — will this fit me.

← Back to index Press G for grid